Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 31(6): 2068-2070, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2272114

ABSTRACT

Low-quality evidence suggests that COVID-19 may trigger reactive arthritis one to four weeks after the infection. Post COVID-19 reactive arthritis resolves within a few days, and no additional treatment is required. Established diagnostic or classification criteria for reactive arthritis are missing, and a deeper understanding of the immune mechanism related to COVID-19 prompt us to further investigate the immunopathogenic mechanisms capable of promoting or contrasting the development of specific rheumatic diseases. Caution should be exerted when managing post-infectious COVID-19 patient with arthralgia.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Reactive , COVID-19 , Rheumatic Diseases , Humans , Arthritis, Reactive/etiology , Arthritis, Reactive/diagnosis , COVID-19/complications , Arthralgia/etiology
2.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 18(1): 205, 2023 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2272113

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immune-mediated conditions associated to Corona Virus Disease-19 (COVID-19) have been reported, including vasculitis, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, myositis, and lupus. Emerging studies have reported the potential occurrence of reactive arthritis in patients previously infected with COVID-19. This systematic review summarised the current evidence on the occurrence of reactive arthritis in patients previously infected by COVID-19. METHODS: This study was conducted according to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. All the clinical investigations describing the occurrence of reactive arthritis following COVID-19 were accessed. In September 2022, the following databases were accessed: PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Embase. The generalities of the study were extracted: author, year and journal of publication, country of the main author, study design, sample size, mean age, number of women, main results of the study. The following data on COVID-19 severity and management were retrieved: type of treatment, hospitalization regimes (inpatient or outpatient), admission to the intensive care unit, need of mechanical ventilation, pharmacological management. The following data on reactive arthritis were collected: time elapsed between COVID-19 infection to the onset of reactive arthritis symptoms (days), pharmacological management, type of arthritis (mono- or bilateral, mono- or polyarticular), extra-articular manifestations, presence of tenosynovitis or enthesitis, synovial examination at microscopic polarised light, imaging (radiography, magnetic resonance, sonography), clinical examination, laboratory findings. RESULTS: Data from 27 case reports (54 patients) were retrieved, with a mean age of 49.8 ± 14.5 years. 54% (29 of 54 patients) were women. The mean time span between COVID-19 infection and the occurrence of reactive arthritis symptoms was 22.3 ± 10.7 days. Between studies diagnosis and management of reactive arthritis were heterogeneous. Symptoms resolved within few days in all studies considered. At last follow-up, all patients were minimally symptomatic or asymptomatic, and no additional therapy or attentions were required by any patient. CONCLUSION: Poor evidence suggests that COVID-19 could target the musculoskeletal system causing reactive arthritis at its post infectious stage. COVID-19 can act as a causative agent or as a trigger for development of reactive arthritis even without presence of antibodies of rheumatological disorders. Treating physicians should have a high index of suspicion while treating post infectious COVID-19 patient with arthralgia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Reactive , COVID-19 , Humans , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Male , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Arthritis, Reactive/diagnosis , Arthritis, Reactive/epidemiology , Arthritis, Reactive/etiology , Inpatients , Antibodies , COVID-19 Testing
3.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 58(10)2022 Sep 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2043858

ABSTRACT

Hip fractures are a leading cause of hospitalisation in elderly patients, representing an increasing socioeconomic problem arising from demographic changes, considering the increased number of elderly people in our countries. Adequate peri-operative treatment is essential to decrease mortality rates and avoid complications. Modern management should involve a coordinated multidisciplinary approach, early surgery, pain treatment, balanced fluid therapy, and prevention of delirium, to improve patients' functional and clinical outcomes. The operative treatment for intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures is intramedullary nail or sliding/dynamic hip screw (DHS) on the basis of the morphology of the fracture. In the case of neck fractures, total hip replacement (THR) or hemiarthroplasty are recommended. However, several topics remain debated, such as the optimum thromboprophylaxis to reduce venous thromboembolism or the use of bone cement. Postoperatively, patients can benefit from early mobilisation and geriatric multidisciplinary care. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, a prolonged time to operation with a subsequent increased complication rate have burdened frail and elderly patients with hip fractures. Future studies are needed with the aim to investigate better strategies to improve nutrition, postoperative mobility, to clarify the role of home-based rehabilitation, and to identify the ideal analgesic treatment and adequate tools in case of patients with cognitive impairment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Femoral Fractures , Hip Fractures , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Aged , Bone Nails , Bone Cements , Anticoagulants , Pandemics , Hip Fractures/surgery , Treatment Outcome
4.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 58(7)2022 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1938900

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: Starting in early December 2019, the novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) from infection with COVID-19 has caused a global pandemic. Many aspects of its pathogenesis and related clinical consequences are still unclear. Early diagnosis and dynamic monitoring of prognostic factors are essential to improve the ability to manage COVID-19 infection. This study aimed to provide an account of the role played by vitamins C and D on the onset, progression and severity of COVID-19. Clinical features and infection-related risk factors are also briefly discussed. Material and Methods: In March 2022, the main online databases were accessed. All the articles that investigate the possible role of vitamins C and D on COVID-19 susceptibility, severity and progression were considered. Results: The current evidence on vitamin C and D supplementation in patients with COVID-19 infection is inconsistent and controversial. In some studies, vitamins were used as coadjuvant of a formal experimental therapy, while in others as main treatment. Ethnicity and hospital setting (inpatient/outpatient) were also variable. Moreover, there was no consensus between studies in administration protocol: high heterogeneity in dosage, administration, and duration of the treatment were evident. Finally, some studies administered vitamins pre- and/or during COVID infection, in patients with different risk factors and infection severity. Conclusions: While waiting to develop a targeted, safe and effective therapy, it is important to investigate individual predisposition and proper disease management. Concluding, available data on the use of nutraceuticals in COVID-19 are inconsistent. However, there is a lack of evidence-based guidelines which recommend vitamin C and D supplementation in patients with COVID-19, and results from high quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are inconsistent. Current investigations so far are mostly observational, and include a relatively small sample size which can lead to biased results. Large-scale multicentre studies are therefore needed.


Subject(s)
Ascorbic Acid , COVID-19 , Vitamin D , Vitamins , Ascorbic Acid/therapeutic use , COVID-19/therapy , Disease Susceptibility , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Vitamin D/therapeutic use , Vitamins/therapeutic use
5.
Eur J Med Res ; 26(1): 84, 2021 Aug 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1339152

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has markedly impacted on cultural, political, and economic structures all over the world. Several aspects of its pathogenesis and related clinical consequences have not yet been elucidated. Infection rates, as well morbidity and mortality differed within countries. It is intriguing for scientists to understand how patient genetics may influence the outcome of the condition, to clarify which aspects could be related the clinical variability of SARS-CoV-2 disease. We reviewed the studies exploring the role of human leukocyte antigens (HLA) genotypes on individual responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or progression, discussing also the contribution of the immunological patterns MHC-related. In March 2021, the main online databases were accessed. All the articles that investigated the possible association between the HLA genotypes and related polymorphisms with susceptibility, severity and progression of COVID-19 were considered. Although both genetic and environmental factors are certainly expected to influence the susceptibility to or protection of individuals, the HLA and related polymorphisms can influence susceptibility, progression and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The crucial role played by HLA molecules in the immune response, especially through pathogen-derived peptide presentation, and the huge molecular variability of HLA alleles in the human populations could be responsible for the different rates of infection and the different patients following COVID-19 infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , HLA Antigens/genetics , SARS-CoV-2 , Alleles , COVID-19/etiology , COVID-19/immunology , Disease Progression , Genotype , Humans , Severity of Illness Index
6.
Expert Opin Biol Ther ; 21(12): 1551-1560, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1196932

ABSTRACT

Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 induces a cytokine storm and can cause inflammation, fibrosis and apoptosis in the lungs, leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ARDS is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity the associated to COVID-19, and the cytokine storm is a prominent etiological factor. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles are an alternative therapy for the management of inflammatory and autoimmune conditions due to their immunosuppressive properties. The immunomodulatory and tissue regeneration capabilities of extracellular vesicles may support their application as a prospective therapy for COVID-19.Areas Covered: We explored the clinical evidence on extracellular vesicles as antiviral agents and in mitigating ARDS, and their therapeutic potential in COVID-19.Expert Opinion: Clinical trials using extracellular vesicles are registered against COVID-19 associated complications, with some evidence of safety and efficacy. Extracellular vesicles present an alternative potential for cell therapy for COVID-19 management, but further preclinical and clinical investigations are needed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Extracellular Vesicles , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation , Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Surgeon ; 19(5): e199-e206, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-919514

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The covid-19 pandemic has dramatically changed lives of residents and medical students. In particular, the learning process has undergone widely changes, especially due to the rules of social distancing which have forced universities and various institutes to modify lessons, work shifts and internships. PURPOSE: The purpose of our review is to evaluate how the various institutes have faced the covid-19 emergency and guaranteed the perpetuation of the learning process of resident and students. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the medical literature in PubMed and Google Scholar was performed including all the works explaining how the institutes have reorganized teaching for resident and undergraduate students. MAIN FINDINGS: The use of internet for the dissemination of teaching material and educational meetings has built bridges, albeit virtual, between resident and teachers. New techniques for teaching and conducting exams have been introduced. The rotating team system allowed the continuation of the teaching activity in safety. CONCLUSION: Thanks to remodulation of the teach modalities, the massive use of internet platforms, a wise distribution of work shifts, and others, universities and hospitals have not only reduced the impact on the learning process of resident and students but also turn this pandemic into a moment of personal and professional growth for the new generation of healthcare professionals.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Communicable Disease Control , Education, Distance/organization & administration , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/organization & administration , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Specialties, Surgical/education , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL